The authorities’s compromise to keep away from a Commons defeat on Brexit has been rejected as “unacceptable” by main rebel Dominic Grieve.
Theresa May gave assurances to either side of the Brexit divide in her party over how a lot say MPs would get on her ultimate Brexit deal.
This satisfied most rebels – who need MPs to have the ultimate say – to again her in a key vote on Tuesday evening.
But the wording of the federal government’s compromise has now been printed.
And Mr Grieve, who had talks earlier on Thursday with ministers, stated he didn’t settle for the federal government’s proposal.
He advised BBC News: “At the tip of the method one thing was inexplicably modified, which had not been agreed.
“The government has made the motion unamendable, contrary to the usual methods of the House of Commons. And therefore it cannot be accepted.”
The authorities’s modification units out what should occur if the prime minister broadcasts earlier than 21 January 2019 that no deal has been reached with the EU both on the withdrawal settlement or the long run relationship.
Under these circumstances, a minister should make a assertion in Parliament inside 14 days and provides MPs an alternative to vote.
However, the vote could be on “a motion in neutral terms”, merely stating that the House has thought of the assertion.
Mr Grieve had needed the modification to say that the federal government should search the approval of Parliament for its plan of action – and that ministers have to be directed by MPs and friends.
The UK is because of go away the EU in March 2019, and negotiations have been happening on the phrases of the separation and the way the 2 sides will work collectively sooner or later.
The authorities is making an attempt to go a new legislation, known as the EU Withdrawal Bill, which it says is required to make sure a “smooth and orderly Brexit”.
Its primary functions are to finish the supremacy of EU legislation within the UK, and switch current EU legislation into UK legislation so the identical guidelines and rules apply on the day after Brexit.
But because it passes by means of Parliament, MPs and friends have been making an attempt to vary it, in some instances including bits on that might change the federal government’s Brexit technique.
These embody strikes to offer Parliament extra of a say within the occasion that it votes to reject the deal caught between the UK and the EU, or if no deal is reached in any respect.
Ministers say they can not enable MPs to determine what occurs subsequent in these circumstances as it could bind their fingers in negotiations.
But supporters of the transfer say it could allow Parliament to keep away from an economically damaging consequence for the UK.
After the House of Lords modified the invoice to offer Parliament a extra decisive say, MPs voted on Tuesday to reverse the transfer – however a number of pro-EU Tories say they held again from voting towards the federal government due to guarantees they have been made that their considerations could be listened to.
In the House of Commons, Labour’s Brexit spokesman Sir Keir Starmer pressed Brexit Secretary David Davis on seemingly conflicting accounts of what the would-be rebels have been supplied.
Mr Davis wouldn’t be drawn on the main points, saying the proposal would meet three standards: that it doesn’t overturn the referendum consequence, doesn’t undermine negotiations and doesn’t change the nation’s constitutional construction which entails the federal government negotiating.