Former Supreme Court chief justice Miriam Naor on Sunday harshly criticized a bill that would drastically curb the courtβs ability to strike down laws it deems unconstitutional, saying such legislation is not used in democratic states.
βWhere did this consensus come from that there is a need for an override clause?β Naor asked at an Israel Bar Association conference in Eilat.
βIn what world do you want to live? In a world in which the court lacks authority? This is not an issue of power,β she added, saying such a clause is not used in democratic states.
Naorβs successor, Justice Esther Hayut, has also come out strongly against the bill, calling it an βunprecedented assaultβ against the judicial branch, in a speech earlier this month.
While the bill, which would give a 61-MK-majority the ability to overturn Supreme Court decisions to strike down Knesset legislation as unconstitutional, was approved by ministers earlier this month, its advancement has been stalled by disagreements among coalition partners over the proposal.
The legislation comes amid efforts by right-wing lawmakers to limit the courtβs power. The matter arose after judges repeatedly stymied the governmentβs bids to imprison and deport African asylum seekers from the country without examining their asylum requests or, according to the court, sufficiently ascertaining the safety of the countries to which they were to be deported, as Israel is required to do under international treaties and Israeli law.
Limiting the Supreme Courtβs ability to overturn Knesset legislation would allow the coalition to pass a law that would legalize the deportations.