Image copyright MOD
The UK may have to considerably enhance defence spending whether it is to keep affect with Washington and Nato allies, MPs have warned.
A Commons Defence Committee report says the defence price range ought to rise from 2% of GDP (£40bn) to three% (£60bn).
Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson has reportedly demanded an additional £20bn for his division.
A authorities spokesman mentioned: "We have been clear we will not stop to exceed Nato's 2% spending target."
The committee mentioned the additional cash for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) might be spent on growing the readiness of the armed forces and to bolster Britain's anti-submarine warfare to counter doable threats from Russia.
The report recommends growing the defence price range to three% of GDP however says a rise to 2.5% would "comfortably fill the 'black hole' in the existing MoD budget".
It argued that with out such funding the UK armed forces' usefulness to the United States could be diminished.
"The government must not let this happen," the report says.
Committee member Madeleine Moon, Labour MP for Bridgend, mentioned the UK's armed forces have been "hollowed out" with the navy "very weak" and air functionality "diminished".
She informed BBC Radio four's Today: "Influence is really important because unless you can back it up with capability, you have no credibility."
The MPs' report additionally notes feedback by US Defence Secretary James Mattis that the UK advantages from its defence relationship with the United States by £3bn a 12 months.
"This implies that both the UK armed forces and HM Treasury benefit from our close relationship with the United States," the report says.
"However, that won't cease to be true solely whereas the UK army retains each the capability and functionality to keep interoperability with the United States army and to relieve US burdens.
At subsequent month's Nato summit in Brussels, US President Donald Trump is predicted to repeat his calls for for European allies to spend extra on defence.
BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale says the committee's report will "add fuel to what seems to be an increasingly acrimonious row between the defence secretary, Gavin Williamson, and the Treasury and the prime minister."
He says there have been warnings of a Conservative backbench rebel if extra funding is just not forthcoming.
Over the weekend it was reported that Mr Williamson threatened to finish Theresa May's management if she didn't present extra money.
However Chief Secretary to the Treasury Liz Truss has warned cupboard colleagues that it's "not macho" to demand extra funding.
Writing within the Telegraph, she argued a tax and spend coverage would hurt the Conservatives within the opinion polls.
Get information from the BBC in your inbox, every weekday morning
Lord Houghton, who was the chief of defence employees between 2013 and 2016, mentioned "it would be a great shame" if the armed forces price range was used as a part of a "political game".
He informed Today the present defence plans had been "unaffordable" and the UK needed to "make a decision" about "what sort of country we aspire to be".
Lord Houghton mentioned: "The first responsibility of presidency is the safety of the nation.
"We have barely deluded the general public of late that we have now a defence programme that frankly we all know is unaffordable.
"We are to an extent living a lie."
A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence mentioned: "The UK maintains the largest defence price range in Europe we have now been clear we won't cease to exceed Nato's 2% spending goal.
"The defence secretary launched the Modernising Defence Programme to strengthen our armed forces in the face of intensifying threats."